- #Uml software rational rose how to
- #Uml software rational rose generator
- #Uml software rational rose full
- #Uml software rational rose code
#Uml software rational rose code
That is because the analysis model describes the *problem*, but you want to get code for the *solution*. If you completely define the requirements too early in the project, the customer might get what asked for, but very likely not what he needs most.ĭuring analysis if modeling is undertaken with a UML CASE tool without the intention of generating code then the modeling process seems less relevant in relation to the systems implementation, but provides a stagnate period of documentation.īesides the fact that because of the reasons mentioned above analysis shouldn't ever end, the analysis model isn't good for generating code from.
Therefore, what the customer now needs is not what he will need when the project ends.
#Uml software rational rose how to
Customer and development team learn how to communicate more effectively (if you let them), the customer learns what he really needs (especially if he can use early versions of the system) etc. people learn while working on a project. My primary reason for this is to completely define requirements.įor almost any project it is quite suboptimal to *completely* define the requirements before near the end of the project, for two reasons: MIT's Open Courseware Software Engineering Laboratory to make initial planning more structured, and identify poorly thought out or disorganized development ideas from the start, as well as make it easier to make rapid changes to code either mid-development or after initial development. I'm hoping to use UML with the concepts described in
#Uml software rational rose full
In the past, my planning has too often been very high level, so that when specs or circumstances change mid-development, tracking the full impact of these changes on all affected routines has been haphazard, resulting in time wasted tracking down bugs and last-minute code re-writes. I've found that the past few projects I've worked on, there's been too much muddled thinking from the outset in terms of planning and organization of code - although UML is a tool and will not in itself save you from this, I'm hoping that it will bring greater discipline to the process. I'm thankful for all the feedback and grateful for the links to various editors provided.
please give me your thoughts on this topic. I too believe pen and paper is fantastic but only for very very high level designs. Model for the system, not for the maintenance�. In conclusion, the basis for modeling as documentation is pointless unless you want an overview of how the system work. A framework which fulfills requirements is a lot more difficult to modify than no framework, after all the framework will be basically perfect because design problems and requirements were nutted out in the pre-development stages Generated code when used properly will provide a framework for the whole system.
I bet if you compared a model which was not generated with a complete reengineered model of the same system there would be great differences, differences alot more noticeable than with a generated code skeleton. If code generation does not occur your model doesn�t need to be complete (for system creation). Moreover, modeling without the intention of generation will lead to undefined requirements because the actual code is not affected by the model.
#Uml software rational rose generator
During analysis if modeling is undertaken with a UML CASE tool without the intention of generating code then the modeling process seems less relevant in relation to the systems implementation, but provides a stagnate period of documentation.Įxample, if I am modeling using a UML CASE and I have a rough idea how I will design the system (which most designers have) and I have no intention of generating code, then the process of modeling is only a documentation task because if the model was complete then a skeleton code could be created (why wouldn�t you use a code generator if it will basically produced the same code that you will be forced to write). My primary reason for this is to completely define requirements. I am a strong believer in modeling with the goal of generating skeleton code.
0 kommentar(er)
